Lady Venom wrote:The thing is though, true psychopaths don't understand/can't fathom the real emotions of love/acceptance/kindreds of any kind.
It's always been and always will be, a twisted means to further the end.
Though yes, I feel it was more that HE wasn't the one to have ended it. Think about it, he was still playing, still enjoying a new toy. It was taken away from him; leaving him with nothing.
If ever he felt any sort of attachment, it was on a purely manipulative means.
I do actually believe Rampage was feeling loss for a kindred spirit in Transmutate.
Since you've studied mental concerns for the last 13 years, I trust your assertion that psychopaths can't understand true empathy. I mean there
might be a question about how to define love, acceptance and kindred, but that stipulation is sort of besides the point for me right now.
So, I will then conclude, as you are, that a psychopath feeling loss for someone he or she truly finds to have been a kindred spirit is a paradox.
Therefore, to say that Rampage felt true loss for Transmutate presents a logical problem. But I think there are two ways of solving that problem:
1.) Either we change our perceptions of the characters being observed
-You suggest, for example, that because Rampage is a psychopath, he couldn't have truly felt loss over Transmutate's death- he must have been mad he wasn't the one to destroy her. Then again, maybe you have always perceived that episode that way which would technically mean this isn't a change in perceptions for you. But it would be for me.
-Within this option we could also say that maybe Rampage just isn't a psychopath.
Or
2.) It is possible that our perception of Rampage both being a psychopath and feeling loss over Transmutate is actually correct, and the reason for the paradox lies within the writers of the specific episode.
I believe option 2 is the more accurate of the two options.
I, for example, did not know what you asserted a few posts up, about psychopaths not feeling true empathy, until you said so (and backed up your claim with an impressive 13 years of research). It is possible, therefore, that the writers were also unaware of this contradiction- that they thought a psychopath like Rampage could feel loss, and then wrote him that way to add even more weight to his character.
And I think there's evidence for that possibility too:
I don't think I need to provide any evidence on why Rampage is a psychopath. Everyone seems to agree on that. So, what evidence is there to suggest he felt loss for Transmutate?
First there's his statement when Transmutate's coming out of her (?) pod "Yes, yes, I feel your pain, your desperation. Your Spark is powerful! Fight your way free! Fight!" This could just be that he wants to have her around for a while before he destroys her, but I guess it never hit me that way.
Then there's his statement "The darkness of its spark echoes my own. It belongs with me!" This could technically be perceived, again, as evidence of him wanting Transmutate as another game, but... in all the times I've watched that episode, that possibility has never even occurred to me. This may be because he said "belongs
with me" as opposed to "belongs
to me".
"We are two of a kind. We belong together." Belong isn't normally spoken in reference to a temporary condition, though that, too, is possible.
I think the biggest factor in this, thought, is the fact that Silverbolt's last line was "for the moment we are brothers."
No, Silverbolt isn't Rampage. Yes, Silverbolt could have misperceived the reasoning for Rampage's sorrow. But Silverbolt's dialogue isn't just an extension of his own convictions. Especially in view of the fact that this was the very last line of the episode, it seems very much so that the writers were giving their final conclusion of the matter to the audience. If Rampage was not truly feeling empathy for Transmutate, then, psychopath or not, the writer's would have had to intend that for him the whole time. And if they did, then Silverbolt's conclusion would essentially be an intentional attempt to throw the audience off. It would be a lie, from the writers to the audience- good in the middle of a 24 episode, but rather mean, and perhaps, pointless, at the very end of a character developing Beast Wars episode.
And I must consider what evidence there is for the possibility that he was just angry he didn't destroy her himself. The biggest evidence here would be his psychopathic nature.
But firstly, he
did destroy her. It took Silverbolt's missiles too, but Rampage's ammunition was on the other side of the force field she was in when she died.
And secondly, there's something to be said for the fact that Rampage didn't go chasing after the Maximals after her death. If he had merely lost a toy or a chance for a game or a tool to get his spark back, it seems quite likely that his first reaction would have been vengeance. I can't claim to understand someone like Rampage fully, but he does not seem the type to simply brood over something if he felt he must be given restitution for it that he could actually achieve.
Of course, that argument is double edged- if he would be mad at the Maximals for making him lose a toy, game, or tool, how much angrier would he be at the Maximals for making him lose a kindred spirit?
I think the sorrow of the matter, then, comes from the fact that not only did he lose Transmutate, and that is absolutely halting to him (which indicates, to me, true loss rather than loss over a toy/tool), but he feels no need to seek restitution because he knows he was
part of her destruction. He realized he, too, had killed her, and his part in it wasn't the Maximals' fault.
For these reasons, I think that Rampage was meant to be feeling empathy in that episode, and the contradiction in him feeling empathy and still being a psychopath comes from a misconception on the part of the writers.