Eep! I've only returned to the forums now, so I only get to answer this now. >.>
Ah, one of my favorite topics.
((LONG post, sorry))
Predacons crave many things and power is one of them. They also crave war because as we can see from the Maximals point of view Maximals wanted peace between the two races but Predacons wanted to fight.
They don't want peace but destruction.
Now why would that be? Most statements point to the idea that Predacons are looked down upon by Maximals because they are descended from the Decepticons. It's possible that Predacons act that way because they are expected to. Besides, the only Predacons we ever did get to see were all somehow related to Megatron. Not so flattering towards their faction.
And do any of you honestly believe that
all Predacons are destructive? I mean, what about those back on Cybertron?
The term "Predacon" seems to act as a stereotype, stemming from the more violent root, the Decepticon.
In the words of Megatron: "An enemy which appears to be peaceful may in fact be merely biding its time!"
It's called deception, quite a common tactic in conflict (not necessarily war or violence).
Let's go back in time. Before there were wars and the Decepticons and the Autobots, there was only the Transformer. It was only when the first Megatron rose to power that the Decepticons became a faction and the same for the Autobots. In most fictions, it is suggested that the denizens of Cybertron had to choose between the two factions. Those who did not became the Empties/Neutrals during the war. The more destructive and "I get what I want" bots became Decepticons and the protective and peaceful bots became Autobots.
((*sigh* My brain is starting to hurt))
Alright, present time. The Decepticons lost. They were placed as secondary citizens of Cybertron while the Autobots went off and partied.
So then Autobots = Maximals and Decepticons = Predacons. No third faction, it seems. So where did the Neutrals go? Some of them may have joined the Maximals, others the Predacons. Whichever appeals to them. But the Neutrals were not displayed as destructive, so they'd probably make bad Predacons.
Yeah, right.
Alright, after going through all that, my point is here: the Maximals have a finer lifestyle than the Predacons. They are most likely given access to things that make life better, though they are expected to follow all laws. The Predacons however, have a more free way of life, probably violating a few laws every once in a while, all for the sake of enjoyment or some other good thing.
So, basically, whatever floats their boats. Some Predacons might even be bots of morals.
On the note of the Maximal Elders: They ARE politicians. And lower officials could be corrupt for all we know.
Ah...I could go on and on about the Predacons. So I might as well give a little credit to the Maximals.
Autobots and Maximals = Epitome of Goodness and Perfect Little Angels? Well, like you all said, no one is perfect. Omicron is a fine example of that. Depth Charge too, come to think of it. He's got quite the vision of justice. But then, as Una said, justice depends upon the person.
On Maximal peace...peace is like any other abstract noun, the meaning depends on the persons. I mean, IDW's G1 Megatron called
desolation peace. How's
that for a meaning?
Grah...I'm getting no where. And this post is long enough without me adding more stuff. Post end.
PS. Welcome to the debate team, Una!